There are days when I genuinely wonder what kind of country we are trying to build, because too many people seem determined to tear down every effort the government makes, no matter the scale, no matter the vision, no matter the long hours spent trying to move Dominica somewhere better. And yes, this one feels personal. I have watched this government fight uphill battles for years, taking on projects that larger islands themselves hesitate to attempt, while critics wait in the shadows, ready to pounce the moment a river changes colour or a truck moves in a valley.
Let me say it plainly: development is messy. It shakes the ground. It moves earth. It disrupts rivers, hillsides, access roads. Anyone who pretends otherwise is being dishonest. Yet instead of recognising the magnitude of the work or the long-term value of what is being built, opponents go straight into panic mode, writing dramatic online posts as if Dominica is collapsing under a bulldozer. They call anything they do not understand “destruction” and label every technical activity as an attack on the environment. That kind of exaggeration is not concern. It is sabotage.
I feel a deep dismay watching how quickly some Dominicans twist progress into scandal. This is not the Dominica I grew up believing in, a country that once celebrated ambition, that once stood proud when national projects took shape, that once saw development as a shared responsibility rather than a political battlefield. Now it seems that every initiative is filtered through suspicion, as if government actions must always carry some dark motive. That kind of thinking does not build a country. It paralyzes it.
What frustrates me most is the arrogance of those who claim they know more than engineers, planners, geologists, hydrologists, survey teams, and international consultants. People with no professional background in major infrastructure projects talk with an authority they have not earned. They see sediment and declare environmental collapse. They see machinery and decide it must be corruption. They see progress and conclude it must be incompetence. It is exhausting to watch this cycle repeat, over and over, even when the facts say otherwise.
The government has a duty to transform Dominica, and it has been doing exactly that. The international airport project is not some backyard hustle. It is a generational investment. It demands precision, it demands coordination, and yes, it demands a level of confidentiality during certain phases, a reality anyone who has ever managed a large-scale project would understand. But critics choose to ignore process and fixate on drama. If they cannot see a document instantly, they assume the worst. If they do not hear a statement quickly enough, they construct their own story and that is very reckless behaviour.
What pains me is that their noise has consequences. It demoralises professionals who are working tirelessly behind the scenes, engineers who leave their families for weeks at a time, planners who spend nights reviewing data, ministry officials who must balance safety, timelines, and budgets in conditions far more complex than any critic acknowledges. These people are public servants. They carry the burden of national development on their shoulders while others sit behind keyboards inventing crises.
And sometimes I admit the harshness builds up inside me, knowing it is unfair that the people who contribute the least are the ones who speak the loudest. It is unfair that every mistake, delay, or natural effect of construction becomes a weapon. It is unfair that people who want Dominica to remain stuck in small-island fear disguise their reluctance as environmental concern.
But amid that harshness, the intelligence must remain clear, because the truth depends on structure rather than emotion, and development advances through protocols, review cycles and international standards, with regulation still active. It has not dismissed environmental responsibility. It has not acted carelessly. What it has done is take on a massive national undertaking, the kind of project that transforms economies and rewrites a country’s future.
Critics may not realise that progress unfolds unevenly, with rivers that fluctuate, soil that shifts and sediment that settles only for a time. Work zones look rough before they look refined. These are not signs of recklessness; they are signs of work in motion. The government understands that, and it is equally understood by the engineers and by the people who want Dominica to grow over the long term.
It is those determined to see only failure who cannot understand it.
I do not expect every Dominican to support every decision made by the government. Democracy requires disagreement, though it must remain informed rather than opportunistic and anchored in reality rather than expanded for political benefit. The attacks we are seeing now are not rooted in patriotism. They are rooted in the desperation of people who cannot stand to witness a government actually delivering.
And so, yes, this commentary comes with emotion, a mix of pride in what the government is accomplishing, frustration with the shallow noise surrounding it, and disappointment in how quickly some of our own people undermine the very progress they claim to want. Yet emotion alone is not the point. The point is that Dominica is finally building something monumental, and it deserves the space to complete that work without being dragged into manufactured chaos.
Those who care about this country should step back and allow development to unfold. Those who oppose everything simply because the government proposed it should ask themselves what they truly want for Dominica. And those who continue to mislead the public with half-truths and theatrics must be confronted, because the future of the island is too important to be derailed by noise.
Development requires courage. The government has shown it. The critics have not.
This article is copyright © 2025 DOM767
