Social scientist Simeon Joseph has questioned the value of political manifestos in Dominica, arguing that many campaign promises made over the past five decades have not translated into clear action after elections.
Joseph said his review of political manifestos dating back to 1970 suggests that many of these documents function more like New Year’s resolutions than firm commitments to voters. He argued that parties often present wide-ranging pledges during campaigns, only for many of those promises to be abandoned or left unfulfilled once they assume office.
“Manifestos in Dominica can be equated to New Year’s resolutions,” Joseph said, adding that people often declare what they intend to do at the start of the year and then quickly forget those commitments.
Joseph pointed to the 1975 Dominica Labour Party manifesto as one of the few examples he believes produced substantial results. He said that the document included commitments connected to institutions and projects such as Dominica Social Security, the National Bank, the Aid Bank, the port and the Women’s Bureau, with only a small number of items not delivered.
By contrast, he said later manifestos have produced far weaker results. Joseph argued that more than 300 promises were made in Dominica Labour Party manifestos over the past 25 years, but fewer than 50 were delivered.
He also referred to several major promises he said had not materialised as expected, including a proposed cruise ship berth at Lalay Coco and commitments linked to Roseau rehabilitation.
Joseph’s comments add to ongoing public debate over political accountability, campaign promises and whether parties should be held more closely to the policies they present to voters during election campaigns.
He suggested that citizens should examine manifestos not only as campaign documents, but as records against which governments and political parties can be measured after they receive public support.
This article is copyright © 2026 DOM767
